A while back I got into a conversation with a close friend about the ability to separate a man from his work. Specifically, we were dissecting a situation in which it was discovered that an artist we both loved had religious views that conflicted significantly with those of my friend. After hearing my friend’s views on the matter, it seemed pretty clear to me that a personal disagreement with the beliefs of anyone shouldn’t have any impact on your opinion of their work. A person may very well be defined by their beliefs, but it is arguably part of the very nature of art to surpass the environment in which it was created.
I assumed a state of equine elevation and provided the following passage from Scrubs as an illustration of my opinion.
Doctor Cox: Fair enough. Why don’t we go ahead and take a look at my personal life? I am in love with a woman that I hate, my two-year-old son calls me “Pewwy,” and – this is something that I’ve never actually shared with anybody before, but – on Saturday nights, I like to throw on a nice dress, go out to dive bars, and insist that everybody call me Mrs. Haberdasher!
Elliot: [laughs, then thinks] No, you don’t.
Doctor Cox: Well, even if I did, it wouldn’t really matter since that has nothing to do with how good of a teacher I am. Stick with me here, Barbie. The point is that if you finally found somebody who makes you believe in yourself as much as you did yesterday, well, I would think twice before I wrote that person off. [emphasis mine]
If you enjoy the work of a creator, then it is unwise to attempt to cut it out of your life. I considered the matter closed. I believed what I said. Art may come from people, but art is not people. (Did you know Hitler was a pretty talented artist?)

Made by Hitler
However, in spite of my supposed convictions, I recently found myself so outraged by comments made by a particular author that I considered renouncing my love for his work. Orson Scott Card is the author of the Ender’s Game series – a science fiction series so good I have yet to find its equal. I first read Ender’s Game when I was in high school, and the vivid imagery and rich characters depicted in the series has stayed with me since. Orson Scott Card is certainly an incredibly talented author.
In February of 2004, Mr. Card published an article in which he vehemently condemns same-sex marriage and its current position as a politically hot topic. This article has recently started circulating the Tubes again, in light of another article Mr. Card recently published in The Mormon Times (link no longer functional) in which Card states (in part),
“Regardless of law, marriage has only one definition, and any government that attempts to change it is my mortal enemy. I will act to destroy that government and bring it down, so it can be replaced with a government that will respect and support marriage, and help me raise my children in a society where they will expect to marry in their turn. Only when the marriage of heterosexuals has the support of the whole society can we have our best hope of raising each new generation to aspire to continue our civilization.”
Without bringing my own beliefs too much into this, it will suffice to say that treason aside, I find Card’s attitude reprehensible. It is one thing to believe that marriage is a religious act and shouldn’t be in any way involved in government, but it is an entirely different thing to take a personal offense to gay marriage and propose the kind of wide-scale revolt and rebellion that Card is proposing.
So it has fallen on me to smoke what I’m dealing, as the saying goes. Projecting my disdain for Card’s beliefs onto his (brilliant) work of fiction would be akin to blaming a child for the sins of his father. I can’t support that.
So, Mr. Card, I think you’re wrong. But I LOVE Ender’s Game.